EA is shutting down BioWare

One of my favorite game companies ever. But it had already been "shut down" in practice after the acquisition.

• eterm · 4 hours ago

  Yes, the mourning for the company that made KOTOR and NWN was done years ago, it's effectively a completely different company now that's shutting down.

• vkou · 4 hours ago

  It wasn't shut down after the acqusiition, it's been dead and just shambling along as a zombie for nearly two decades. The last impressive things they shipped were Mass Effect and DA:O. That was 19 and 17 years ago. Everything since has been trend-chasing and running on creative fumes.

Many great memories of KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect. RIP

Another victim of EA. Bought, ruined, buried.

The studio behind masterpieces like Dragon Age Veilguard and Mass Effect Andromeda? Sad day

• baal80spam · 4 hours ago

  You forgot /s, right? Anyway - good riddance.

  • 2OEH8eoCRo0 · 4 hours ago

    I thought it was so obvious as to be insulting to readers to include it.

    • dude250711 · 4 hours ago

      I a bit like scent trail or yellow paint, isn't it.

  • rjh29 · 4 hours ago

    For a site with users supposedly more intelligent than Reddit, HN's inability to detect sarcasm (or any kind of nuance) is always amusing.

    • serf · 4 hours ago

      probably not related[0] [0]: https://www.autismparentingmagazine.com/autism-and-sarcasm/

• izacus · 4 hours ago

  I believe you forgot the massive hit that was Anthem.

> The company is also laying off around 400 staffers, Bloomberg reports, including around 50 at BioWare. The changes follow EA being taken private by an investor group led by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, Silver Lake, and Affinity Partners in a $55 billion deal that closed in August. Never thought that Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund would shutdown the company that created so many childhood memories.

Bioware hasn't released a good game in over a decade, and Anthem was a low point for the entire game industry imo I'm honestly surprised they lasted this long. Sad to see them go but only because they should have been way better

• indy · 4 hours ago

  Exactly, the Bioware that people love hasn't existed for a long time

• akimbostrawman · 4 hours ago

  Veilguard made Anthem look competent and fun

It's the new hot business model. Buy a very successful studio then liquidate it.

• HelloMcFly · 4 hours ago

  Bioware hasn't been very successful - creatively or economically - in some time. I loved their heyday more than most, but they're far from what they once were.

  • mardef · 4 hours ago

    The people who made everything we loved from BioWare left more than a decade ago. BioWare, in the last 12 years, has released: Mass Effect: Andromeda, Dragon Age: Veilguard, and Anthem. It's still painful to see the studio go away, but I sadly agree.

    • Agentlien · 4 hours ago

      I was at another EA studio when BioWare released Andromeda and Anthem. Got to play an early closed beta of Anthem, heard lots of details about Andromeda's development as it was happening. As a huge fan of their games it felt crazy and very sad. However, The Veilguard to me was amazing. I loved that game and it's my favorite Dragon Age.

      • hbn · 3 hours ago

        Veilguard is a serviceable action romp but it's not a Dragon Age game.

• mosura · 4 hours ago

  Bioware have not been very successful for a very long time. Even in the good times their ability to create (and hide) black holes was prodigious.

• jbmchuck · 4 hours ago

  Nothing new under the sun - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguis...

• angrydev · 4 hours ago

  EA bought Bioware 19 years ago. Are you saying this was their strategy for two decades?

  • anthonypasq · 3 hours ago

    cmon man, dont let facts get in the way of a narrative. just let gamers whine in peace

• Crusoe123 · 4 hours ago

  For EA this is modus operandi for a long time. I remember them buying the likes of Bullfrog, Westwood back in the 90s and then shutting them down a few years later.

• ex-aws-dude · 3 hours ago

  You could not be more wrong They were purchased decades ago

The makers of Baldur's Gate, Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect, Dragon Age: Origins. Sad, even though BioWare was dead already.

• LarsDu88 · 4 hours ago

  Let us not forget MDK2

  • wellthisisgreat · 4 hours ago

    MDK, MDK2 are truly like nothing else out there. Art

    • flumpcakes · 4 hours ago

      Those games are so weird but stylishly alluring. I remember buying a big box of MDK and playing through the game in probably a day or two.

• newsclues · 4 hours ago

  Also Anthem!

• 0cf8612b2e1e · 4 hours ago

  Check the release dates on those games.

  • santoshalper · 4 hours ago

    No doubt. It's been a very long time since Bioware was a great studio.

    • uberman · 3 hours ago

      Check the release dates of their best games against the date of purchase by EA and then compare everything after than to everything before that.

End of an era, but the writing has been on the wall for a while now.

Talent in western game studios just can't shake the startup mode. Try get a hit, try to get bought, cash out, run away. Blizzard seemed to defy the stereotype but it died a long time ago, it's just a husk. The contrast with japanese game studios is impressive.

• loosescrews · 4 hours ago

  Bioware had a string of hits before EA bought them.

  • ErneX · 4 hours ago

    They lost their way when the doctors left.

  • esseph · 4 hours ago

    Probably one of the best game studios ever, IMO. (In no certain order) - Baldur's Gate - Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn - Neverwinter Nights - Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic - Star Wars: The Old Republic - Jade Empire - Mass Effect - Mass Effect 2 - Mass Effect 3 - MDK2 - Dragon Age Origins - Dragon Age II - Dragon Age: Inquisition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BioWare

    • 4dregress · 3 hours ago

      I really enjoyed Neverwinter Knights 2.

      • pepperoni_pizza · 2 hours ago

        That was Obsidian.

      • tsimionescu · 2 hours ago

        Neverwinter Nights 2 was made by Obsidian, not Bioware. And I would argue Obsidian was the better studio anyway. Besides NWN2, and moreso its fantastic expansion, Mask of the Betrayer, they also made the excellent Knights of the Old Republic 2, Fallout: New Vegas, and their own original franchises, Pillars of Eternity 1 and 2, and Tyranny.

        • esseph · 37 minutes ago

          Bioware sent engineers to provide help to Obsidian (SW KOTOR2, I think). Obsidian and Bioware both had a working relationship with Black Isle Studios. Love them all, they did some great stuff.

    • uberman · 3 hours ago

      ... and then EA purchased them and forced the frostbyte engine and release cadence expectations and mechanics that worked for FIFA Ultimate Team.

• Insanity · 4 hours ago

  Blizzard is owned by MSFT now, so it did get bought out (back in 2022). So it fits the 'startup mode' model that I _think_ you're trying to say? There's other studios that similar to Blizzard didn't get bought out early and published multiple hit games, like Insomniac Games.

  • bigstrat2003 · 4 hours ago

    Blizzard effectively got bought out when they merged with Activision. It wasn't technically a buyout, but Blizzard quality was never the same after that.

    • Henchman21 · 3 hours ago

      WoW Forever seems like they're at least attempting to try for the brass ring again. But it has such a "been there, done that" feel that I suspect its more to capture revenue from a new generation.

      • brailsafe · 2 hours ago

        > But it has such a "been there, done that" feel that I suspect its more to capture revenue from a new generation. The "been there, done that" vibe is their pitch to the older generation who no longer cares as much about technically or ladder climbing and just wants something to do when it's cold outside

    • goolz · 3 hours ago

      Yep, and all these years later, we have lost so much. It may seem like such a small thing, but losing real GMs in WoW makes me really sad.

    • anthonypasq · 3 hours ago

      Blizzard has not been independent since 1994, but people on the internet love picking some arbitrary point in time when "Blizzard died" when in reality the timeline and quality of their releases has almost zero correlation with who they were owned by at the time.

  • anthonypasq · 3 hours ago

    Blizzard has not been independent since 1994, but people on the internet love picking some arbitrary point in time when "Blizzard died" when in reality the timeline and quality of their releases has almost zero correlation with who they were owned by at the time.

    • keyringlight · 2 hours ago

      Similar with Westwood (part of Virgin interactive) and Bioware (parceled up with Pandemic studios, owned by Elevation partners, who sold it to EA)

    • ram1500natrluvr · 2 hours ago

      I like Jason Schreier's take that the end of Blizzard began as soon as WoW blew up in popularity. "Imagine a Blizzard that never made or never found the success they did with WoW and continued on the path of boxed releases every couple years." I did find myself rather salty back then that it felt like Blizzard abandoned anything outside of WoW until 2010. WoW wasn't something I ever grew an interest in, yet I played an absurd amount of SC and WC3. Then SC2 was a huge miss for me, as well as every game after it.

      • anthonypasq · 1 hour ago

        > the end of Blizzard extremely exaggerated. Recent reports said they are the top game studio at microsoft.

        • ram1500natrluvr · 37 minutes ago

          Yes, of course there's the financial performance of a studio and then the identity of a studio that people get attached to. I didn't get into Blizzard games because they were a financial powerhouse, I got into them because they were fun as hell and the identity of Blizzard at the time gave me faith that their next release would be just as fun. That faith started deteriorating around 2005/6 for me, and was gone within a month or so of SC2 releasing. The identity of Blizzard of the 90s and early 2000s that I fell in love with was gone by 2010. I can go into more detail about the shortcomings of all of the games from 2010 on (IMO, obviously), but the overall point is that they are fundamentally different than their older games and might as well have been from a different studio.

      • leoc · 1 hour ago

        There seems to be a bit of a symmetry between what WoW did to Blizzard and what WH40K did to Games Workshop.

• the__alchemist · 4 hours ago

  *US game studios. Continental Europe has been continuing to put out masterpieces. (Many countries: Poland, Croatia, Czechia, France, etc)

  • flumpcakes · 4 hours ago

    Why do you think that is? What would you consider a European masterpiece? And what would you consider something that falls short from outside Europe?

    • mcmcmc · 4 hours ago

      The Kingdom Come: Deliverance games from Warhorse Studios and the Witcher franchise from CD Projekt Red (both Polish) are excellent and have won a ton of awards Lots of non EU games fall short, including several mentioned in this thread, e.g. Anthem

      • antiframe · 3 hours ago

        > The Kingdom Come: Deliverance games from Warhorse Studios and the Witcher franchise from CD Projekt Red (both Polish) Warhorse Studios is Czech; Slavs are not all alike.

        • mcmcmc · 31 minutes ago

          My mistake, I misremembered. Unfortunately can’t edit.

    • santoshalper · 4 hours ago

      CDPR is probably the flagship studio in Europe. Interestingly, they are probably the modern studio that most resembles Bioware in the 2000's.

      • izacus · 4 hours ago

        Warhorse studios as well. Rebel Wolves. Machine Games. IO interactive. The list is rather long.

      • Hamuko · 1 hour ago

        Not really sure if they're comparable to a Bioware since CD Projekt Red the studio is basically the one and the same as CD Projekt the publisher. They also own GOG.com. They're probably more comparable to a Valve, with game development, game publishing and game distribution under a single roof.

        • SSLy · 1 hour ago

          CDPR has looong been separated from the publisher arm, and recently from the GOG one. Probably for the best for CDPR.

      • AdrianB1 · 1 hour ago

        Unfortunately CDPR is showing some signs of Bioware-ing. As much as I liked Cyberpunk 2077, it was visibly "less than" Witcher 3 in too many ways. This is a sign of decline.

    • the__alchemist · 4 hours ago

      European masterpieces, recentish: - Talos Principle 2 - Expedition 33 - KCD2 - Anything by Arcane - Anything by CDPR - 007 Last light / Hitman - Blue Prince This is subject to taste, but the games I've been personally enjoying the most are almost all European. US games are comparatively mediocre. I don't have an explanation; only this observation. I was startled when noticing it. Most recently, I'm loving Order of the Sinking Star, and that's from a US team. There's hope!

      • kridsdale1 · 3 hours ago

        Baldurs Gate 3 was made in Europe!

      • flumpcakes · 3 hours ago

        > Order of the Sinking Star I was going to mention this game as a counter point but then realised that if I am doing that it's kind of the exception that proves the rule. I do wonder why this is, perhaps there's more money in the US to build bigger games with bigger teams and you just get the 'too many cooks in the kitchen' syndrome. I must admit most AAA games from the US over the last decade have been underwhelming for me.

        • chainingsolid · 1 hour ago

          To be fair Order of the Sinking Star is by Jhonthon Blow + (who ever he employed). So if we rephraze it from US to US AAA studios, it still works.

      • AlexandrB · 3 hours ago

        The US gaming industry has serious Hollywood envy. There's a constant push to make games "cinematic" and put big name actors in leading roles. This not only bloats budgets but results in barely-interactive monstrosities where gameplay is just a bridge between long, non-interactive cutscenes. It's ironic because Hollywood is not doing too well at the moment.

        • autoexec · 3 hours ago

          I like "cinematic" games, and have never had a problem with long cutscenes as long as they told a good story. Games are a great medium for storytelling and cutscenes are better than delivering plot strictly by having players hunt for thousands of short snippets of text. I'm far less impressed with big name actors and that seems like a massive waste of money. As long as the acting is good, and the voices aren't obnoxious, I don't care who the actor is. People might see a movie just because it has an actor they like in it, but I don't think that carries over too well to games.

          • AlexandrB · 2 hours ago

            It's definitely a balancing act. There are some great cinematic games (Last of Us), but it's also easy to put all the focus on the cinematic aspects and have a bunch of mediocre gameplay as filler in between. I don't understand why more games didn't go the Half Life 2 route and have the conversation/cinematic play out around you without taking control away completely.

            • autoexec · 2 hours ago

              That really is a good way to handle it, although it does open the door to miss certain things if players don't do what's expected. For example, in the opening chapter for the last of us you can miss the news report on the TV and the stuff going on outside through the windows before Joel comes in. More than once in games I've only been clued into the fact that I missed a jump scare by a sudden musical sting. In one sense, that's perfectly fair. In life if you're looking at your feet or spending your time examining the walls you'd be oblivious to what's going on around you, and for non-critical things having a bunch of little moments that you can only catch if you're in (or looking at) the right place at the right time can improve replay value, but games would have to be careful to make sure that the important stuff can't be missed.

            • IslandRebel · 32 minutes ago

              Last of US I replayed about 5 years ago on the PS4, and it isn't a good game. I recently revisited Uncharted (Last of Us is just Uncharted with a more serious tone), and they are not good games. I think casual audiences like them because of the heavy story element, but they are quite tiresome to play. There are also a bunch of "action/adventure" mechanics that seem to be identical in a bunch of mainstream games. You have an upgrade system, so the actual gameplay of the game is bad at the start because you don't have any of the fun abilities at the start, open world mechanics, a very bland open world and the stories are very PG-13, and the characters are kind of bland in the main story. I was playing Ghosts of Tshushima, and many of the mechanics come straight from Farcry 3. I think I am not going to bother completing it. I feel like I've played this game many times before because it's so similar to other games. I would have probably got bored with it before now if it wasn't for the setting. Generally, a lot of people are still replaying some of the greats from the late 2000s to the mid-2010s because the games weren't nearly as bland.

      • tsimionescu · 2 hours ago

        You're forgetting a few major ones: - Baldur's Gate 3 (German) - Disco Elysium (Estonian) - Divinity: Original Sin 1 and 2 (same studio as BG3) BG3 is notable for its gigantic success. And Disco Elysium is one of the best written games ever made, and it showed that you can have a fantastic RPG with no combat system whatsoever, while still having meaningful progression.

        • SSLy · 1 hour ago

          > - Baldur's Gate 3 (German) Bruh, Larian is in Belgium

      • ZekeSulastin · 1 hour ago

        > Anything by CDPR They're lucky they were able to No Man's Sky CP2077 alongside Edgerunners being well received.

      • IslandRebel · 51 minutes ago

        I think many of these games you've listed are a 7/10. A lot of games I am playing are either years old now or I am going back to older consoles (via emulation normally) and the classic games on them.

      • mrcsharp · 42 minutes ago

        To add to this list, Remedy Entertainment. They don't miss. - Alan Wake 1 & 2 - Control & Control Resonant (came out last month) - Quantum Break They are a small studio but release fantastic works of art every time. If you haven't heard of them, you might've heard of Max Payne. It was developed by these guys.

    • rossvor · 4 hours ago

      If we are sticking to the CRPG theme. Then the Witcher 3 and Divinity: OG 2, BG3 and Disco Elysium would be the obvious choices. If you told me in beginning of 2010s all of the future hits in this genre will come out outside of US and Bioware/Obsidian will fade away, I would be quite surprised (but maybe shouldn't have, considering their owners and financial situations)

    • 4dregress · 3 hours ago

      The Witcher 3, Any GTA game

    • Henchman21 · 3 hours ago

      Valheim, Enshrouded. Each sit at the peak of the genre, IMO.

    • charm137 · 3 hours ago

      As many have mentioned, BG3, CDPR's Witcher and Cyberpunk 2077 franchise, Remedy's Control / Alan Wake franchise (both original IPs) to name just a few. DICE (within EA) comes from Sweden and it's responsible for EA's core Frostbite engine alongside its Battlefield franchise. I cannot point to the reasons as to why. Many of these teams are global teams - so a lot of the same problems apply: marketing costs/timelines, release-time crunch etc. The one difference I can point to is that perhaps executive payouts are not overly dependent on total shareholder returns.

  • hbn · 3 hours ago

    BioWare is a Canadian studio (But purchased by EA obviously)

• AtlasBarfed · 4 minutes ago

  There's probably a bit of a lottery winners effect. So consider backing there. There may have been 20 companies trying to make 20 games, All in startup mode. Now two or three of those succeed ed.. which means the management and team chemistry and creativity all worked really well. And the team members will have them mistaken impression that it's that easy. But then some people leave some people ad in the next games, sure, they may have a better foundation than some other team situations at others, but it's going to gradually regress to the mean

Knights of the Old Republic will forever be one of my favorite games RIP to an amazing creative group

• make3 · 4 hours ago

  maybe obvious, but Baldur's Gate 3 is really that level (or better) of a game (recommendation)

  • Mr_Eri_Atlov · 4 hours ago

    Oh it definitely is, but I played KOTOR dozens of times as a kid

  • ninininino · 4 hours ago

    In some ways yes, in some ways no. To me at least, somehow KOTOR and KOTOR 2 made me care more about the characters and story than BG3. BG3 has better systems and combat and gear and such, but for many the worldbuilding, story, quests and such of KOTOR have yet to be beaten. Bastia Shan, Carth Onasi, Visas Marr, HK47. The story of Revan and its twists. Perhaps its just nostalgia and many KOTOR fans having been at an earlier age when they played those Bioware games compared to DOS 2 and BG3 though. Maybe people who were teenagers playing Larian games feel as attached to the characters and story as those of us who were teens in KOTOR's heyday did.

  • serf · 4 hours ago

    game to game, sure. story to story, I disagree. kotor was one of the first interactive media franchises to showcase that era in the Star Wars universe, and it was an era that's radically different than anything in the movies. bg3 is a typical DnD setting + sex + lovecraftian elements and flayers sitting in for beholders to spice it up; and they were only there because during dev-time lovecraft was a huge gaming trend. don't get me wrong; I love both of them, but the BG3 story was the one that ended up feeling like -- for me -- something that would have been a modpack for Neverwinter Nights.

    • panzagl · 4 hours ago

      > they were only there because during dev-time lovecraft was a huge gaming trend. I guess you have the edition of Deities and Demigods where they were cut...

    • shoobiedoo · 3 hours ago

      Likewise. The bg3 story felt like a very long, strung out and milked dry "you have sickness x, go the hospital and figure out a treatment" level of depth

• nozzlegear · 4 hours ago

  I know it's not Bioware, but Kreia from Kotor 2 is still one of my favorite characters from any video game franchise. I wish I could experience those games for the first time again, but as an adult.

  • Henchman21 · 3 hours ago

    You may enjoy Kreia's Conundrums: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nziFrCt5o2w&list=PLujAdpHxJg...

• akimbostrawman · 4 hours ago

  >RIP to an amazing creative group i can assure you that the original amazing group has been gone for over a decade. modern bioware has only been good at dragging someone else's legacy through the mud.

This comes not long after Sony basically killed Bungie. Destiny 2 is "done", and Marathon has an extremely low player count and is in the process of dying.

• ErneX · 4 hours ago

  Destiny will go on.

  • serf · 4 hours ago

    by necessity of Marathon having turned out to be a flop.

    • ErneX · 3 hours ago

      Yeah it did not do well, but it’s my favourite game of the year so far.

They wrote on the flipboard: If GTA6 online next month... We'd better shut down the company

• koziserek · 1 hour ago

  too late to edit, adding the reference https://youtu.be/X5ZbQgPfvkA?si=RUDwdzn8ADavfAFF&t=164

I am still extremely bitter about how BioWare, in my opinion, ruined the dragon age franchise. While not "truly" turn based, dragon age origins and dragon age 2 had the spirit of it, and felt like a party-based tactical RPG. Then out of nowhere, the studio decided to abandon that with inquisition and turn it into an action/adventure style of game. I had never really been so bitterly disappointed with a game release. After that I knew they were done. ME3 was the last good game they released, imo.

• esseph · 4 hours ago

  When Dragon Age 2 came out, Bioware was still running things day-to-day. By the time of the next Dragon Age game, EA was deep in making decisions.

• unsnap_biceps · 4 hours ago

  They wiffed on ME3's ending.

  • ishouldbework · 4 hours ago

    At least you can pick the color filter to apply to the ending.

  • nfw2 · 4 hours ago

    they could go from infamously bad ending to one of most creative endings ever by just saying indoctrination theory is correct

    • Forgeties79 · 2 hours ago

      “It was all a dream” nonsense IMO. It’s fun to play with that idea, but I’d find that a lame cop out ultimately.

  • xen0 · 4 hours ago

    To be fair, ME3's ending was doomed before that game started. I'd place it around the start of ME2.

    • rl3 · 4 hours ago

      ME2's ending was just terrible . The boss fight was ridiculously cheesy. In contrast, ME1's ending may have well been a master class in game cinematography and writing.

      • jasomill · 3 hours ago

        The entirety of Mass Effect 1 was a master class in writing, from the opening cinematic to the ending credits, that more than made up for somewhat janky (though nevertheless entertaining) gameplay.

        • bigger_cheese · 2 hours ago

          I think the Mass Effect games were very flashy but the gameplay elements were pretty shallow. It felt like all the dialog led to the same outcomes, you could be a paragon and give all the "good" replies to conversation or give all the edgy renegade replies and the story would proceed the same way. It kind of felt like it gave you the illusion of choice without actually giving you any real choice. I think it was endemic to the 2000's era RPG's Fallout 4 had exactly the same problem. The combat wasn't very engaging either it was a boring feeling cover shooter. None of your character abilities or gear or anything seemed to have much of an effect.

          • marklar423 · 1 hour ago

            Are there any games you like that you felt did give you a real significant choice in how the story played out?

      • xen0 · 3 hours ago

        Much of ME2's story is terrible (some of the side character stuff is delightful, but the 'main quest' is a train wreck). My point was that ME3 was doomed because ME2 utterly failed at bridging the gap between the strong start of an epic that was ME1 and what should have been the conclusion in ME3. In fact 'fail' may be generous. I don't think it even 'tried'.

        • trey-jones · 2 hours ago

          I always thought this was a hot take but I agree!

    • iugtmkbdfil834 · 3 hours ago

      True.. it is genuinely hard to deliver on that kind of a build up.

  • autoexec · 3 hours ago

    The studio's biggest sin came before that when they used DLC to paywall off major parts of the story in ME2. Anyone who didn't fork over even more of their cash got an incomplete game and a plot that made no sense.

    • baud147258 · 12 minutes ago

      The only major part of story of ME2 that got paywalled is the Lair of the Shadow Broker and I don't feel like I missed much by not playing it (at least on my first playthrough, second I had the DLC). And even if you take a ME2 save with that DLC to ME3, I felt like ME3 does a decent job of explaining what had happened.

  • Forgeties79 · 2 hours ago

    Meh I liked it. In fact they shouldn’t have caved and added to it IMO.

• bigstrat2003 · 4 hours ago

  IMO the last good game they released was DA:O. ME2 was such a let down, with them removing the RPG elements from the gameplay and the main story being a mess which railroaded you into working with Cerberus. ME3 was even worse. While it's sad to see Bioware go, they haven't been making good games in quite a long time.

• gambiting · 4 hours ago

  I might be in minority but I really enjoyed both Inquisition and Veilguard.

  • taurath · 3 hours ago

    I thought Inquisition was quite enjoyable but clearly showing EA's management structure and the story of the game's development and decision chains. It won GOTYs for a good reason because they really did take a huge swing at a massive world and for the most part they succeeded. Veilguard was very poorly marketed to appeal to a neoliberal crowd as if the characters and identity was the primary draw rather than the core story themes (Wizards v Templars, Societal Order vs Individual Freedom, the capacity for evil and corruption of either side) and the world which was fascinating. I love me some inclusion and well crafted characters, but the focus on it to the exclusion of all else as a queer person it gave me the same ick as a corporate float at a pride parade.

  • cjk · 3 hours ago

    I enjoyed Inquisition and couldn’t stand Veilguard. But I also never played any of the earlier DA games.

  • idrathernotsay · 2 hours ago

    You're in the minority for Veilguard but Inquisition is their highest selling entry in the series

    • gambiting · 2 hours ago

      With Veilguard I really enjoyed the combat systems. It was fun progression and at the end of the game you were literally a demigod on the batlefield - it was super fun, and taking some of the toughest optional challenges was very satisfying. And the character storylines(especially Lace and Emmrich) were very very good and I enjoyed them a lot. The weakest point for me was the big bad villain, who seemed barely competent to do anything at all - but overall I really enjoyed it.

• LinXitoW · 3 hours ago

  Ironically, the gameplay is what meant I only managed to get through DAO and DA2 with a bunch of cheats. Realtime with pause is a horrible monstrosity. It combines the worst parts of action and turn based. Veilguard was my favority gameplay wise, but the writing... well you know.

  • hakunin · 3 hours ago

    Honestly, I've felt this way before (gaming since the 90s), but try watching somebody play RTwP a bit to get a feel for it. It can become very smooth and comfortable. The hardest part is to learn to trust the timings.

Really loved Jade Empire and Mass Effect. But they had lost their touch quite some time ago. Not surprised this was coming

It's not like no one saw this coming. Here's a comic from nine years ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/7cxz4a/eas_graveyar...

• john_strinlai · 4 hours ago

  i enjoyed this comic, similar in theme, posted today: https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcf.preview.re...

• autoexec · 3 hours ago

  For those without reddit accounts, here's an accessible link to that page at old.reddit.com https://web.archive.org/web/20230610092047/https://old.reddi...

Sic transit gloria mundi. I think that a lot of Bioware fans just had nostalgia though - their recent work doesn't seem to have been as well received as their franchise initiator games.

Their last really good game was Dragon Age: Origins. It is nice that they put the studio out of its misery.

BioWare shutting down is sad, but it’s really a classic ship of theseus situation. There are a handful of notables still there but the majority of the teams that made the classic Baldur’s Gate, KOTOR, and Mass Effect disappeared a long time ago through natural turnover and a couple of brutal rounds of layoffs. The silver lining is that the talent didn't vanish and we have teams like Archetype working on Exodus, Stoic with The Banner Saga, or offshoots like Yellow Brick and Beamdog.

• ramesh31 · 4 hours ago

  >The silver lining is that the talent didn't vanish and we have teams like Archetype working on Exodus, Stoic with The Banner Saga, or offshoots like Yellow Brick and Beamdog. This is generally the case in the games industry. Great dev teams seem to function more like bands than companies. For however you feel about the latest iterations, the first Call of Duty was an absolute revelation to the FPS genre that we never would have gotten without the EA firing of the MoH team.

  • bathtub365 · 2 hours ago

    And then they moved on to make Titanfall 1 and 2 after the founders were unceremoniously fired by Activision, which were also great games

• da_chicken · 4 hours ago

  That is true, but by that logic EA ought to have stopped being a completely awful around 15 years ago. It's especially egregious when you consider why Electronic Arts was founded. Activision's origin and reputation when they were bought out are similarly dark. The analogy would be more easier to swallow if it wasn't always used as a mask for enshittification.

  • nemomarx · 4 hours ago

    There's no rule that says it has to be a positive or negative change overall, just that the people involved are always changing. if they had found the right new talent bioware could have pulled it off too maybe, it just wouldn't be the original bioware either way

  • cherrychon · 2 hours ago

    They kinda did... You live in a Universe were CnC Remastered Collection happened, CnC Open-Source happened. I'm still kinda mad cuz I'm into Gacha & I really, really wanted 2 see that Legion game. Maybe even... CnCxAnimu? I'd buy that! They kinda still around w/ BF & FIFA\Madden which is a Money-printing machine. I never understood this, I just wanted NHL back on the PC. Yeah, there is 2004 w/ the Rebuild mod & an OSS port which I didn't checked out. +There Games up 2 '07 4 the PC, but it seems like the Community decided that '04's the ticket. I always wanted a 'Bloodbowl'/Speedball Hockey title which is a crossover w/ Figure Skating... Where the Figure Skating gurls are like Bayonetta/Rayne & she posseses certain kind of superpowers while the Males are all like WH40k Space Marines & the Goalie is her FemDom Slave or smh? xD Anyhow... 2 bad I can't into gfx.

• Hamuko · 4 hours ago

  Is the talent not vanishing backed up by data? The gaming industry has always been an extremely brutal industry, and I wouldn't be surprised if the low wages, long hours and zero job security permanently burn out some of the talent.

  • aresant · 4 hours ago

    I don't have inside knowledge but have followed Bioware (given how many of their games live rent free in my head) 1 - 2017 they cut from 500 -> ~350 2 - 2023 went from 350 -> 200 that included a bunch of very senior people including the OG writer of Baldur's gate Lukas Kristjanson 3 - Early '24 cut down to 100 skeleton crew as the writing on the wall for DA Veilguard sales materialized (sold about 1.5m vs 3m projected)

    • mjr00 · 3 hours ago

      Note that the 1.5m number given for Veilguard was for the vague term "engagements" rather than sales, so there's additional padding going into that figure.

    • jonaustin · 3 hours ago

      And veilguard was an abomination of corporate groupthink based on some perceived cultural zeitgeist. I couldn't finish it the dialogue was so painfully cringe.

      • torginus · 2 hours ago

        Weird, I have a friend who's a hardcore DA fan, and he liked it, but told me it's very different. Tbh, I think the issue is that old RPG designers understood players have very different values and goals, hell they even wrote some academic articles on it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartle_taxonomy_of_player_type... The devs of today played the games of yesterday, and felt that the game catered to them, and then sought out making a game like that, but they didn't put in the effort or consideration to appeal to other kinds of players. And turns out there's economics involved - while people playing shooters want to shoot people in general, RPG players are a diverse bunch with different needs, and if you don't scratch the itch of a certain subgroup, that's part of the audience gone. Which results in a bomb - a game made for 20% of the playerbase will sell 20% of the copies, and will be a flop.

  • torginus · 2 hours ago

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5qKN2Yxaok&t=1s Halo went from <200 people making a game from scratch to >2k people making the same game on an engine (without multiplayer) - so the design scope is even smaller now. I don't get how you can lower the scope, have 10x the staff, and still overwork yourself - I mean, I certainly think it's possible, but that speaks of colossal mismanagement. I mean the graphics got better (not that anyone cares, people still play old games, if graphics were a true differentiator, people would say new games are better because they look better, but they don't). This is very hard to explain - and so expensive it's actively killing the industry.

    • christkv · 46 minutes ago

      It became a corporate job instead of a smallish team excited about building the games they wanted to play.

• so-gala-massey · 3 hours ago

  BG1 & 2 were clearly labors of love. You could feel it in the game play. But the 90s were a different time before gazillion dollar budgets and expectations.

  • AlexandrB · 3 hours ago

    I think the best way to keep quality up is to stay small. Supergiant Games is a great example of this approach. Once you have a massive publisher and expectations to ship AAA (or, heaven forbid, AAAA) games it's usually just a matter of time.

    • hx8 · 2 hours ago

      It's surprising what a small team can accomplish, but there are some projects that need a large team to be feasible. It would be nice if there was a clear path on how to grow a game studio and continue to deliver quality.

      • hinkley · 2 hours ago

        It’s too bad Spore tanked so badly. He thought he had a solution to the high production values issue, but it panned out so poorly that nobody has tried since.

    • Forgeties79 · 2 hours ago

      It helps when you have a hit like bastion be your financial foundation and you don’t have AAA aspirations though. A lot of those deals with publishers and such are because it’s that or the game never gets made (or worse, never finished). And despite how much folks scoff at AAA’s, idk man, it’s fun to play a tentpole title. It was fun to get excited for Ace Combat this year. I can’t wait for the new Metro game (I would say they’ve exited AA territory).

    • hinkley · 2 hours ago

      We should learn the lesson of John Carpenter. Some people have a medium that they’re brilliant in, and the scarcity of resources is part of what makes them brilliant. Give them an infinite budget and things go to shit. Timur Bekmambetov might be a more recent example. The Night Watch movies were wonderful. Then he made Wanted, which was expensive dross. The best thing about that movie is that he put a couple actors from Night Watch as supporting cast in it. He’s done one or two things since that rate mention, but going Hollywood made him worse, not better.

    • darth_avocado · 36 minutes ago

      > Once you have a massive publisher and expectations to ship AAA (or, heaven forbid, AAAA) games it's usually just a matter of time Having to ship AAA games isn’t the problem. The problem is the incessant need to only focus on live service games so that they can milk their consumer left and right. Studio executives come in with unrealistic sales expectations, which then means you can only try and make games that have a live service component to generate a constant revenue stream, which then means you can’t make good games anymore. You’re either making games that are similar to other and get lost in the crowd or are forced to differentiate by promising something that’s never done before, which adds scope, risk and budget to the game. If you noticed all AAA failures in recent times, almost all of them were live service games. Meanwhile the single player market seems to have finally recovering from the neglect it’s gotten in the last decade. Also, look at the BioWare successes and failures. They did well when they did single player games, failed when they ventured into live service.

  • zem · 2 hours ago

    wasn't bg3 pretty universally praised too?

    • hbn · 2 hours ago

      Yes but Bioware didn't make it

      • hinkley · 2 hours ago

        Larian hasn’t broken our hearts, yet. And they’ve made overtures that they will avoid doing so for at least another game or two. But eventually people will retire and then who knows.

        • acdha · 1 hour ago

          I really think it’s going to depend on how big they get. Early BioWare very clearly had everyone committed to building games they were proud of; EA’s management equally clearly are just moving money around for things they don’t care about or believe will negatively impact them personally. I think that pattern is widespread around the greater tech industry: antitrust enforcement, etc. would be great for having fewer cases where decisions which affect thousands of people are being made by executives who are really detached not just from consequences but simply awareness of what’s going on in each of the different segments of their business.

    • nrjames · 2 hours ago

      That was developed by Larian, not Bioware.

      • zem · 2 hours ago

        ah, didn't realise that!

• kar1181 · 2 hours ago

  The first dragon's age was absolutely ace too.

  • cherrychon · 2 hours ago

    True dat. DLCs worth every penny & then the modded content... Ohoho!^^ Prolly the last good, genuine CRPG from teh Warez of the Bio!

  • idrathernotsay · 2 hours ago

    Dragon Age 2 got a chilly reception at launch but has aged well considering what came after and is definitely worth a playthrough, doubly so with mods

    • kar1181 · 2 hours ago

      I got on with 2 the worst of all of them. Well like most people didn't play Veilguard but of 1-3, 2 was hard work.

    • swiftcoder · 1 hour ago

      Weirdly, 2 is the only DA I've ever played all the way through. DA:O and Inquisition both just kind of dragged on and on for me, where 2 had much more even pacing.

    • christkv · 53 minutes ago

      I just remember dragon age 2 to feel rushed and underdeveloped. The scale also felt a lot smaller than the original.

  • hinkley · 2 hours ago

    I never played Diablo more than the demos but loved Torchlight, which was substantially the same team as the first Diablo game. But Runic got tired of making Diablo XX over and over again and eventually folded. I briefly tried to cyberstalking the team to figure out which studios they ended up at, but didn’t dig deep enough to come up with any suggestions.

• beloch · 2 hours ago

  When EA bought Bioware in 2007, people said they'd run the studio into the ground. It took two decades for that to happen and they released some pretty awesome games in that time. However, a studio that used to hit everything out of the park did become one that missed a lot in recent years. Going forward, I hope Bioware's people land great new jobs, and here's hoping some of their IP gets picked up by other studios. Mass Effect in particular is a fantastic creation that a lot of people would love to spend more time in.

  • baud147258 · 23 minutes ago

    > It took two decades for that to happen I think 2 decades is a bit generous considering the state of Bioware recently. When was their latest game that was well-received? Dragon Age Inquisition?

  • doctorpangloss · 19 minutes ago

    it's a little complicated. a lot of blizzard and riot execs who left to start game studios took a ton of money and have been developing games for years. nearly all of those games will not be commercial successes. so who really knows the meaning of talent nowadays? on the flip side, studio owners, through no effort of their own, have been practically gifted a solution (hint: it's two letters) to nearly all of the problems relating to their actual risks, which are all focused on production and the nimbleness to respond to player feedback. the real question is whether or not EA still has distribution channels that no one else has.

• 59percentmore · 13 minutes ago

  In other industries, institutional knowledge is transmitted to subsequent generations of employees, resulting in some amount of consistency in product quality. But that does require a leadership culture that is, *gestures vaguely towards Japanese developers* and not *gestures vaguely toward everything beget by EA and Activision's standard-setting*.

Bioware has been dead for over a decade. What we have now has just been wearing its name. Honestly best to just let it go.

One of the notable ways BioWare pushed the industry forward was the ability for the player to initiate a romance storyline with any one of a variety of in game characters. That often included the option of romancing characters of the same gender. I point this out because the Saudi Investment Fund bought EA a couple months back and they obviously have very strong opinions on those sorts of relationships. Are these two connected? I don't know, there are plenty of other potential reasons to close a studio, so probably not. But these are now the sort of questions we have to ask ourselves anytime EA makes a decision like this.

• flumpcakes · 4 hours ago

  I'm going to hazard a guess and suggest that the Saudi Investment Fund is invested in many things that would not be considered polite in Saudi society.

  • slg · 3 hours ago

    Sure, but when one of these investments makes moves that, perhaps coincidentally, make them more polite in Saudi society, it brings up questions regarding the motivation in a way it wouldn't for some other owner.

• pinevale · 4 hours ago

  BioWare hasn't published a successful game in a very long time. Their last releases were Anthem (2019) and DA: Veilguard (2024), both of which tapped into the studio's reputation but underperformed in the long haul. Veilguard was also so "meh" against the backdrop of Baldur's Gate 3 that it probably harmed the brand and the franchise more than if it never came out. They basically used to make amazing games in the 2000s and never quite lived up to that reputation again. Whether the acquisition by EA was the cause or the symptom of the decline, I don't know.

  • santoshalper · 4 hours ago

    Don't forget ME:Andromeda (2017). The truth is that it has been almost 15 years since Bioware made an even arguably great game.

  • ToucanLoucan · 4 hours ago

    Andromeda had a lot of good in it, tbf. Their big mistake there IMO was hard-resetting the universe the way they did. Like I was excited for more mass effect but I fell off that game so hard. Mechanically it was solid but I just… didn’t care. Anthem frankly killed them. A live service looter shooter which were already out of vogue by the time it was released. Obviously made by marketing entirely, no soul whatsoever. They never recovered from it.

    • krabizzwainch · 3 hours ago

      I will always defend Andromeda as not being as bad as everyone said. I enjoy going back and playing it, and they were a few better writers away from having a really good game. I cared more about the Irish redhead copilot than about any one of the actual companions.

      • swiftcoder · 3 hours ago

        > I cared more about the Irish redhead copilot than about any one of the actual companions This squares with Joker being a fan-favourite character in the main trilogy

      • pepperoni_pizza · 2 hours ago

        Yeah, Andromeda has some cool ideas (the whole Remnant thing felt like a very classic Scifi mistery) but it was stuck in classing BioWare cliches with companions loyalty quests and romances, the main character being weird chosen one, the main plot was dumb and it was barely a Mass Effect because of the disconnect from the main universe and missing some of the favorite Mass Effect things (like the Geth). It might have been successful if it weren't a Mass Effect. Or maybe not, who knows.

        • keyringlight · 2 hours ago

          I think a large part of the issue is that the sum total of ME trilogy is a hard act to follow, without aiming to sound hyperbolic it's a very bright light that outshines a lot. Anything trying to be a sequel has a difficult balancing act of being familiar versus being different and bringing new ideas in.

    • LaurensBER · 3 hours ago

      > Mechanically it was solid but I just… didn’t care. This is a great summary of the entire issue with the game. I really tried to like it but it didn't inspire any enthusiasm. I didn't really care for the plot, the stakes seemed so low compared to the previous title and none of the races/planets really scratched that explore itch.

    • asanineassasin · 2 hours ago

      They where by than "owing the don" as in there existence was company internally subsidized and you do not recover creative control from that. And those external management initiated "next shiny thing" chases kill you.

  • kzz102 · 2 hours ago

    Yeah, while it's sad they are gone, the reality is that they have been zombies for a long time.

• maxlin · 4 hours ago

  Forward? Sideways at best. Good game developers focus on universal appeal, but instead these kinds of features are almost always driven by activist developers who don't care what damage they do inside the team itself to push these kinds of things through, they muffle true innovation, take away bandwidth needed for more important things, and break teams. And all that before those features and how they're pushed often making the games leave a bad taste on one's mouth, most often soiling a whole franchise. I'm in the process of reshaping my game dev career to avoid contributing to this kind of rot. Don't mind eating noodles if that's what it takes.

  • ainch · 4 hours ago

    Not sure what what specific claim you're making. Do you think gay romance 'soiled' Mass Effect?

  • john_strinlai · 3 hours ago

    > take away bandwidth needed for more important things in a game that already has romance options, adding a same sex romance option is not taking away bandwidth. and i cannot imagine how it would "soil" an entire franchise. just don't choose the same sex romance option if you don't want to. easy.

    • collingreen · 3 hours ago

      They aren't confused about how difficult it is to avoid same sex options in game. They spelled it out clearly - they decided "mainstream appeal" should not even bring up the option and doing so is probably pressure from people they don't like ("activists"). Karens aren't misunderstanding how to mind their own business or live-and-let-live; they are trying to enforce what they see as (or wish were) social norms and don't give a damn about the perspective of the folks on the receiving end of their chirping.

  • swiftcoder · 3 hours ago

    You know, the neutering of same-sex romances in ME: 2 (due to an extended right media campaign), is one of the most universally decried changes, in a game that was otherwise considered an improvement on the formula

  • DonHopkins · 25 minutes ago

    >these kinds of features are almost always driven by activist developers Guilty as charged! I'm an activist developer who threw down the gauntlet and insisted The Sims support same sex relationships. In the June 1998 prototype, when two women tried to kiss, the would-be-kissee slapped the kisser. So I wrote up in my design review that it should support same sex relationships instead of resulting in homophobic violence. The design documents were updated to say heterosexual romance would not be the only kind available, and Patrick J. Barrett III implemented it his own way, which was better than mine: no sexual preference property at all, just relationships, so it was up to you who to love. https://donhopkins.com/home/TheSims/ Then a lesbian kiss lit the fire at E3 in 1999, right after Columbine, when the press was desperate for a non-violent gender inclusive video game to write about. The Kiss That Changed Video Games: https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/the-kiss... Then the franchise made EA $5 billion. How EA’s $5 billion Sims empire has become a magnet for female talent in a male-dominated field: https://fortune.com/2025/01/31/the-sims-25-anniversary/ >who don't care what damage they do inside the team itself to push these kinds of things through, they muffle true innovation, take away bandwidth needed for more important things, and break teams. That's unmitigated GamerGate bullshit. Nobody's bandwidth was stolen, and the team didn't break up -- just the opposite: we original Sims team members have continued working with each other frequently on different projects over the many years since. And same sex relationships WERE the innovation -- Gonzalo Frasca used them as the textbook example of procedural rhetoric, because the designers didn't just draw a rainbow flag, they built a rule into the simulation. Procedural Rhetoric: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_rhetoric Here are the design documents and the record, so you don't have to take my word for it: https://donhopkins.com/home/TheSimsDesignDocuments/ https://github.com/SimHacker/WillWrightShowForFood/blob/main... >Good game developers focus on universal appeal That IS universal appeal. Gays and girls and even boys played it, and it proved there was a huge female audience for games 14 years before GamerGate got it all wrong by attacking women while pretending it was about journalism. >most often soiling a whole franchise Calling same sex romance "rot" that ends up soiling a whole franchise is historically ignorant bigotry, and the claim that inclusion ruins games is the same argument GamerGate made, which The Sims had already proven wrong starting in 2000, more than a decade before GamerGate, when it shipped and went on to become the best selling PC game of all time. If that's what soil looks like, every publisher on earth would line up for a shovel. Enjoy your noodles, but get used to them!

• pixelpoet · 4 hours ago

  I got married in Ultima 7.

  • slg · 3 hours ago

    There's a reason I used the admittedly nebulous phrase "pushed the industry forward" rather than a simpler "introduced" or "invented". BioWare was certainly not the first with this sort of thing, but they popularized it and it was clearly impactful to a bunch of people. For example, you can hear about the impact directly from the mouths of some of BioWare's former employees. [1] [1] - https://blog.bioware.com/2022/07/15/bioware-developer-story-...

  • Razengan · 3 hours ago

    Richard Garriott is getting Ultima back next year btw: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2El7VtPuSzs

    • pixelpoet · 3 hours ago

      Yes, I heard about that too! I really hope he does at least one more truly great Ultima, and he can name his price as long as it really is a proper spiritual Ultima 7 / Ultima Online successor.

    • idrathernotsay · 2 hours ago

      Garriott is a crypto bro, all in on genAI and (IMO) has done nothing noteworthy since selling off the IP. I wouldn't get your hopes up

      • HWR_14 · 2 hours ago

        He was the first high net worth individual to pioneer space tourism.

  • deadbabe · 3 hours ago

    People got married in Ultima Online to real people.

• taurath · 4 hours ago

  Though I think that will absolutely be a factor in future releases for EA for the reason you describe, I think the larger factor was that Bioware wasn't able to succeed in pushing out games that sold well enough, and that is not necessarily entirely on the studio. AAA games in general have been having massive problems with over-management, where you have hundreds of stakeholders for a game. The second there is proven money in a franchise, massive structures of managers start to meddle in everything, demand day and date release promises, and get involved in everything from creative direction to engineering to resourcing. You end up with thousands of people in the credits for games made by a team of 100 artists and programmers. The same thing has been happening to big budget movies and prestige TV shows, to the point that everything becomes this sort of neoliberal corporate soup that reflects the culture of the company. Game studios become victims of their own success. In the same way enterprise software becomes consultant feature slop soup, media becomes focus grouped appeals-to-no-one ultra high production value shovelware. Creative studios stop producing art or meaningful experiences and start producing content.

• AlexandrB · 3 hours ago

  This is a reach. Not because the Saudis don't want to influence the direction of games, but because Bioware has had such a run of embarrassing flops over the past decade that I'm surprised they stuck around this long. Peak Bioware was probably Mass Effect 2 and it's all been downhill from there.